But anyway, there's a game once again this year and I'm genuinely pretty pumped up about watching it. While one team is certainly a favorite here, the fact that the two best teams from the entire year and the top seeds in their conferences are in the biggest game works out pretty well for the NFL.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnmKnvb15MlW2BjFpo-t7rXvc6kTQNTpYKdkU1Y4q2PkPCLMpE27okxJrjAQqFEdo0NoY74vbPFHRBIn2voQT6avWienYkmf9EeSPbsVv9Osj_eMSh1HckiaYfG30P4sZ0uULDBA/s400/Super+Bowl+Power+Ranking+irony.jpg)
But a closer look at those numbers shows that the only way both teams earned me points this year was with victories. I never once correctly predicted a loss for either of these clubs, even if both of the records I ended up having predicted for Indianapolis and New Orleans were exactly right.
So, it sounds like I'm kinda fucked either way here. Which goes back to the girl thing, I guess. Or maybe I should just get on to how everybody else is doing—in these playoffs, I mean:
1. (1) Eric Allen, ESPN: 7-3 (2-0)
1. (1) Jason Cole, Yahoo: 7-3 (2-0)
1. (1) Michael Silver, Yahoo: 7-3 (2-0)
4. (5) Chris Mortensen, ESPN: 6-4 (2-0)
4. (1) Charles Robinson, Yahoo: 6-4 (1-1)
4. (5) Mark Schlereth, ESPN: 6-4 (2-0)
7. (9) Brian Burke, The Fifth Down: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (9) Merrill Hoge, ESPN: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (9) Ron Jaworski, ESPN: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (9) Pete Prisco, CBS Sports: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (9) Pro Football Weekly Editors: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (5) LEV, crazy colored glasses: 5-5 (1-1)
7. (5) Wunderdog: 5-5 (1-1)
14. (9) Mike Golic, ESPN: 4-6 (1-1)
14. (9) Seth Wickersham, ESPN: 4-6 (1-1)
16. (17) James C. Black, Yahoo: 3-7 (1-1)
16. (9) Adam Schefter, ESPN: 3-7 (0-2)
16. (18) YOURS TRULY: 3-7 (2-0)
1. (1) Jason Cole, Yahoo: 7-3 (2-0)
1. (1) Michael Silver, Yahoo: 7-3 (2-0)
4. (5) Chris Mortensen, ESPN: 6-4 (2-0)
4. (1) Charles Robinson, Yahoo: 6-4 (1-1)
4. (5) Mark Schlereth, ESPN: 6-4 (2-0)
7. (9) Brian Burke, The Fifth Down: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (9) Merrill Hoge, ESPN: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (9) Ron Jaworski, ESPN: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (9) Pete Prisco, CBS Sports: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (9) Pro Football Weekly Editors: 5-5 (2-0)
7. (5) LEV, crazy colored glasses: 5-5 (1-1)
7. (5) Wunderdog: 5-5 (1-1)
14. (9) Mike Golic, ESPN: 4-6 (1-1)
14. (9) Seth Wickersham, ESPN: 4-6 (1-1)
16. (17) James C. Black, Yahoo: 3-7 (1-1)
16. (9) Adam Schefter, ESPN: 3-7 (0-2)
16. (18) YOURS TRULY: 3-7 (2-0)
So at least I'm now sharing the cellar. But is there going to be anybody that breaks away at the top?:
* — Oh, Wunderdog's being a bee-yotch with their Super Bowl pick and not making it available without registering or something entirely too complicated, so looks like unless they change that in the next couple days, I've gotta count them out—not that it really means anything anyway.
Ahem.
It's perfectly appropriate that I referenced my numbers this week, because I'm actually going to follow their suggestion:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRjICGG6xHSG1OSVFmTbBzDClg2sHE-uyAzzfwXH8dqw2hG9cZDAMF3Z6aEHTZcR6GuoAgjIi9fLqqlKos_JN11Ejhq6GqOQQJMYhKpF7zPBfB8-ouxM4bIaxFLdhv8QkI5kcf5Q/s400/saintsmini.jpg)
+85/-7 : +81/5/+76 : +83/-4
It has nothing to do with Freeney or Wayne. It has nothing to do with not thinking the Colts don't deserve to be the overwhelming favorite here. Payton Manning has played like a man possessed all year and what in the world would make me think that he suddenly screws the pooch on the biggest stage?
Quite simply, because everybody else is picking the Colts. So I feel like being different—and not just voting for the Green Party in the primary different—but something with a little more reward to being different. Either I vault out of last or I take sole possession of it. This was how it was meant to be. I look forward to adding my final thoughts on this season next week.
No comments:
Post a Comment